WRIT - A No. 8876 of 2024 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 8876 of 2024 Amit Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Himanshu Singh (A/H 0277/2019), Advocate holding brief of Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Pal, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that an advertisement came to be published in the year 2016 for the post of Tube-well Operator in the State of Uttar Pradesh wherein around 3300 posts was advertised by U.P. Subordinate Selection Commission. The writ petitioner was being eligible and he had applied under OBC category and he allotted roll no. 96495. The writ petitioner claims to have selected and a certificate to the said extent was issued on 16.03.2020, however, with the advent of the