Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - A No. 7435 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 7435 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 7435 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7435 of 2024 Ravendar Singh Dhenua .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Singh, Anil Kumar Srivastava, Gyanendra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was engaged as computer operator on contractual basis on 04.04.2017 under a scheme by the name and style of 'MGNREGA'. According to the writ petitioner, a show cause notice came to be issued on 30.03.2024 show causing the writ petitioner as to why adverse action be not taken against the writ petitioner by the Block Development Officer, Noujheel, Mathura to which the writ petitioner claims to have tendered his reply o

WRIT - A No. 7435 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam