Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - A No. 596 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 596 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 596 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 596 of 2026 Sunil Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kauntey Singh, Siddharth Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Navaneet Chandra Tripathi Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Siddharth Khare as well as Sri Kauntey Singh, learned counsels for the writ petitioner, as well as Sri N.C. Tripathi for the respondent nos. 1 to 4. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to Respondent nos. 5 and 6. 3. A statement has been made by Sri Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 that he is well equipped with the instructions and he does not propose to file any affidavit. He further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record.\ 4. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 5. The case of the writ petitioner as worded in the present petition is that the petitioner no.1 was initially appointed as a Constable in RPF on 02.03.2009 and the petitioner no.2 was appointed as Consta

WRIT - A No. 596 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam