Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - A No. 3133 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3133 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3133 of 2026 Rahul Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Sunder Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shyam Sunder, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The writ petitioner claims to be a first information report who has lodged against the respondent no. 5 with respect to case crime no. 455 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 308, 504, 506, 354B, 392 IPC and 7/8 POCSO Act and section 3(2)(va), 3(1)(da) 3(1)(dha) SC/ST Act, police station-Khurja and according to the writ petitioner, the respondent no. 5 is not entitled to be accorded appointment on the post of Constable. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the writ petitioner has no locus standi, however, he submits that the respondents conduct the document verification as well as the character verification and in case something is found against the respondent no. 5, s

WRIT - A No. 3133 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam