Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - A No. 3105 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3105 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3105 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3105 of 2026 Sudama Prasad Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambuj Maurya, Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Navneet Yadav holding brief of Ms. Atipriya Gautam, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as a Constable on 11.11.1983, promoted on the post of Head Constable in the year 2006 and superannuated on 31.12.2023. However, post retirement, by virtue of the order dated 30.04.2024 passed b

WRIT - A No. 3105 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam