WRIT - A No. 3101 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3101 of 2026 Sushil Kumar Arya And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Garima Shukla, Rajendra Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Garima Shukla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra for Respondent nos. 2. 2. On the oral request, learned counsel for the writ petitioners is permitted to correct the array of parties, in so far as Respondent nos. 4 and 5 are concerned. 3. The writ petitioners claim themselves to be engaged through a service provider on contractual basis, but they have not been paid honorarium. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Chief Medical Officer, Mau. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certif