Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - A No. 3074 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3074 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3074 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3074 of 2026 Hari Shankar Rai .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Operator in Police Radio Department, U.P. and he superannuated on 31.12.2025, however owing to pendency of a criminal case being case crime no. 225 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 117 IPC now by virtue of a communication of the Accounts Officer Personnel in the office of Finance Controller addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Sonbhadra, the files pertaining to the post retiral benefits have been returned on the pretext that already cases is pending against the writ petitioner. So the writ petitioner cannot be extended pensionary benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that though the order came to be passed on 28.11.2025 but the

WRIT - A No. 3074 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam