Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-27

WRIT - A No. 3056 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3056 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3056 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3056 of 2026 Ramakant Gupta And 27 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri V.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petitioners claim to be members of Prantiya Rakshak Dal as Volunteers. According to them, they have completed requisite training but they have not been allocated work. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioners needs adjudication at the first instance by third respondent, District Youth Welfare & Prantiya Rakshak Dal Officer, District Banda. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and certified copy of the order before the third respondent, District Youth Welfare & Prantiya Rakshak Dal Officer, District Banda by 13.03.2026. Thereafter, the third re

WRIT - A No. 3056 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam