Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - A No. 3031 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3031 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3031 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3031 of 2026 Indresh Kumar Dubey .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Driver in Police Department and superannuated on 30.06.2022, however, the respondents have recovered an amount of Rs. 2,46,026/-, the writ petitioner seeks refund of the same. In view of the judgment in State of Punjab Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), 2015 (4) SCC 334 and Thomas Daniel Vs. State of Kerala and others, (2022) LiveLaw (SC) 438. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the writ petitioner may approach the fourth respondent, Finance Controller/Chief Finance & Account Officer, U.P. Police Headquarters, Allahabad. 4. Considering the submission so made across the bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with self attested

WRIT - A No. 3031 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam