Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - A No. 2993 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2993 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2993 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2993 of 2026 Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Jay Vishwanath Pandey, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Arya Gautam, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri R.S. Umrao has made a statement at Bar that he does not propose to file any affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed as Constable on 13.01.2011, however, a charge sheet came to be served upon the writ petitioner with an allegation that the writ petitioner was posted as Constable, he was unauthorizedly absent without permission from 06.04.2021 for the period of 7 days. Post denial of the charges, the Inquiry Officer stood appointed who conducted inquiry and sub

WRIT - A No. 2993 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam