Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-26

WRIT - A No. 2955 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2955 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2955 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2955 of 2026 Satya Prakash Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Yadav, Mohammad Qais, Neha Rani, Pawan Kumar Yadav, Satyvendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Satyvendra Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as Sub-Inspector on 20.08.1986 and he is to superannuate on 31.12.2026. However, by virtue of the impugned order dated 08.10.2025 passed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Aligarh, refixation has been done, on the basis of the audit objection. 3. Questioning the same, the present petition has been preferred. 4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has submitted that the order impugned cannot be sustained for the simple reason that the same is unilateral passed behind the back without putting the writ petitioner to notice. He seeks to rely upon the judgment in Bhagwan Shukla vs. Union of India and others; (1994)

WRIT - A No. 2955 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam