WRIT - A No. 2937 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2937 of 2026 Ram Mohan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijaya Shankar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijaya Shankar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anoop Kumar, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was engaged as Meth in the year 1989, regularized on 22.12.2009. According to the writ petitioner, they are not paid additional increments post completion of 20 years of regular service. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by the third respondent, Executive Engineer, Prantiya Khand PWD Bareilly Cirlde, Bareilly. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ peti