Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-24

WRIT - A No. 2769 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2769 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2769 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2769 of 2026 Kamal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Karishma Singh, Manoj Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 30 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Karishma Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner happens to be Assistant Engineer who is to superannuate on 30.06.2026, however, on the basis of forged and a fictitious complaint, the writ petitioner has been attached. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner confines his prayer for disposal of the representation. 4. Learned Standing Counsel summits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs examination at the first instance by the Special Secretary, Rural Development, Section 2, Government of UP, Lucknow. 5. In view the aforesaid factual position, writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty granting liberty to the writ petitioner to approach the second respondent by filing a comprehensive representation along with the self-protested copy of the writ petition and certified copy

WRIT - A No. 2769 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam