Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-24

WRIT - A No. 2714 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2714 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2714 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2714 of 2026 Rameshwar Dayal Goswami And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Kashyap, Virendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Virendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioners is that they are nine in number who had been appointed as Kanisth Lipik on various dates and they have superannuated also, however, they have not been paid promotional pay scale as per the Government order dated 11.08.1983 and 26.04.2006 from the date juniors have been accorded. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioners needs adjudication at the first instance by the third respondent, District Magistrate, Budaun. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions o

WRIT - A No. 2714 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam