Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-17

WRIT - A No. 2370 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2370 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2370 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2370 of 2026 Raj Kumar And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mukesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri Jitendra Prashant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioners is that they are working since 2013 in the Forest Department as the Class-IV employees but they are not being paid the minimum of the pay scale in terms of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Saba Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional forest Officer and others passed in Civil Appeal No. 10956 of 2018 decided on 14.11.2018. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be considered by respondent no. 4 at first instance. 4. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no. 4 to decide the claim of the petitioners within three months in accordance with law. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) February 17, 2026 Aiman Digitally signed by :- AIMAN FAROOQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - A No. 2370 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam