WRIT - A No. 2258 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2258 of 2026 Ramjanam Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Achche Lal Singh Yadav, Awadhesh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri A.K. Malviya, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and he further submits that the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as untrained Lekhpal in different period between 1976 to 1983. However, the services of the writ petitioner stood dispensed with on 08.09.2011, which was subject matter of challenge in Writ-A No.55778 of 2011, Ram Janam Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others, in which on 23.09.2011, the following order was