Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-16

WRIT - A No. 2226 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2226 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2226 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2226 of 2026 Narendra Kumar Gautam .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mohan Pandey, Prabhakar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Mohan Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at bar that he is possessed with the instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter and he does not propose to file any affidavit, the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that while the writ petitioner was posted as Assistant Sub Inspector, a show cause notice came to be issued on 06.02.2025 show causing the writ petitioner as to why recovery be not made with regard to wrong fixation of salary of the Police employee. The writ petitioner submitted a request letter dated 19.02.2025 seeking one month time for giving rep

WRIT - A No. 2226 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam