Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-12

WRIT - A No. 2098 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2098 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2098 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2098 of 2026 S.I. Manoj Kumar Saroj And 19 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Sandeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioners are working on the post of Sub Inspector in different different districts of the State. The petitioners claim that they have completed 19 years satisfactory service and they are entitled to the benefit of one additional increment according to the Government Order so issued on 02.12.2000. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondent authorities to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners while undergoing before they were appointed as Constable for calculating 19 years of service granting one additional increment according to the Government Order. 4. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel did not dispute the judgement da

WRIT - A No. 2098 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam