Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-11

WRIT - A No. 2022 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2022 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2022 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2022 of 2026 Seepu Diwakar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Shahla Jubin Khan, Wasim Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to amend the name of the party in the memo of the writ petition. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Let necessary amendment be carried out during course of the day. 4. Heard Sri Wasim Alam as well as Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel. 5. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners, who have worked during pandemic Covid-19 in the Health Department of district Budaun are claiming benefit of the Government Order dated 27.05.2025 to be re-employed in the event the health workers are being appointed through outsource agencies or otherwise against the vacant positions, may be, on contract basis. 6. It is contended that recently many appointments have been made by Chief Medical Officer, Budaun but the claim of those health wor

WRIT - A No. 2022 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam