WRIT - A No. 2009 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 2009 of 2026 Shivshankar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Shashi Prakash Rai Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Atul Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shasi Prakash Rai, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised regarding the maintainability of the present writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy by approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal by filing an Original Application under Section 19(v) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. 3. In support of the said contention, reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125. 4. Since the petitioner is seeking remedy against the Railways and is posted as a Technician, learned counsel for the respondent could not dispute the legal position. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal having territori