WRIT - A No. 1930 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1930 of 2026 Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Prajapati Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Raj Kumar Prajapati, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner, who have directly applied for the post of Constable, were only paid stipend during the training period, whereas, the candidates who had been in police force and had also applied for direct selection as Sub Inspector, were given salary during the training period as Sub Inspector. 3. Sri Raj Kumar Prajapati, learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that this controversy of discrimination meted out to such Sub Inspectors has come to be addressed to and resolved by a Division Bench of this Court in Alok Kumar Singh & 5 Ors v. State of U.P. & Ors being Special Appeal No. 169 of 2020 decided on 08.09.2021. The said judgment had been unsuccessfully appealed against before the Supreme Court as Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 798 of 2022 was dismissed in lemini on 04.02.2022. He has drawn the attent