Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-10

WRIT - A No. 1911 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1911 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1911 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1911 of 2026 Ramesh Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead respondent no. 5 as Superintendent C.H.C., Kurara, Hamirpur. 2. Heard Sri Ved Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vivek Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. A joint statement has been made by the rival parties that they do not propose to file any affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 4. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 5. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was appointed and selected on 10.11.2012 by Chief Medical Officer as an Accountant in Community Health Center , Kurara, Hamirpur on a monthly honorarium of Rs. 18,000/-, however, now by virtue of the order dated 16.12.2

WRIT - A No. 1911 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam