Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-11

WRIT - A No. 19028 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 19028 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 19028 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 19028 of 2025 Ram Briksh Yadav …..Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and 4 others …..Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amardeo Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ashok Singh Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard Shri Amardeo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashok Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed challenging observations, findings and conclusion recorded in 7th paragraph of the impugned order dated 13.11.2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad (‘Tribunal’) in Original Application (‘OA’) No.106 of 2020 (Ram Briksh Yadav v. Union of India and others), whereby the Tribunal has declined to grant second relief prayed for by the petitioner in the said OA claiming refund of the amount of gratuity of Rs.6,12,751/- along with 18% interest p.a. Second prayer made in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to refund the said amount along with interest at the same rate. 3. The petitioner, who was working as store issuer in the respondent- depart

WRIT - A No. 19028 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam