Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-10

WRIT - A No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1894 of 2026 Raj Mohan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avijit Saxena, Divendu Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Avijit Saxena, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Though in the present writ petition, challenge has been raised to a punishment order dated 22.07.2022, but the writ petitioner confines his prayer at this juncture with regard to direction for disposal of appeal dated 02.08.2023 against the punishment order dated 22.07.2022 pending before the Addl. Commissioner, Head Quarters, Gautam Budh Nagar. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same and claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by Respondent no. 3. 4. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3, who on th

WRIT - A No. 1894 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam