WRIT - A No. 1881 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1881 of 2026 Tarun Kumar Shandilya .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Jee Srivastav, Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Saurabh Srivastava, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at Bar that he is well equipped with the instructions and is in a position to argue the case. He does not propose to file any counter affidavit and the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Junior Clerk in the Internal Audit and Accounts Department and he was promoted as Senior Accounts Clerk in the year 2001, which has been merged and redesignated as Assistant Accountant. The writ petitioner thereafter was promoted to the post of Accountant in the year 2016 and s