Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-09

WRIT - A No. 1873 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1873 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1873 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1873 of 2026 Mithlesh Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar, Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead the fifth respondent, District Program Officer, Kaushambi as party respondent. 2. Heard Sri Lok Nath Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that she is presently posted as Anganwadi Karyakatri since 06.07.2006 and she seeks promotion on the post of Mukhya Sewika. 4. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that from Anganwadi Karyakatri, the writ petitioner is to be first promoted on the post of Anganwadi Worker and then Mukhya Sewika. Be that as it may be, the claim of the writ petitioner needs adjudication at the first instance by the fifth respondent, District Program Officer, Kaushambi. 6. To s

WRIT - A No. 1873 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam