Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-09

WRIT - A No. 1864 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1864 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1864 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1864 of 2026 Praveen Kumar Saxena .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar, Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. Instructions have been supplied by Sri B.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel, submits that he is well equipped with the instructions and the instructions are self-sufficient for disposal of the writ petition and he does not propose to file any further affidavit and the petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record, thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Gram Panchayat Adhikari on 01.02.1993 and thereafter the writ petitioner was promoted on the post of Assistant Development Officer, Panchayat Raj on 19.07.2021. According to the writ petitioner, certain benefits relating to ACP came to be accorded to

WRIT - A No. 1864 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam