Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-09

WRIT - A No. 1785 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1785 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1785 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1785 of 2026 Km. Krishnawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Kumar, Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri S.K. Shukla, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for the Commission. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that an advertisement came to be published bearing number "5 of 2022" for the appointment on the post of Mukhya Sewika. The writ petitioner claims that though she has secured the cut off marks, but she has not been asked to appear for document verification. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for direction to the respondent no.2 to conduct document verification. 4. Sri Siddharth Singhal, who has put in appearance on behalf of Commission has apprised the Court that the cut off marks is 67.1571, however, the writ petitioner secured 61.3628 marks. It is also contended that the document verification was to be conducted on 17.12.2024, however, the p

WRIT - A No. 1785 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam