Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-06

WRIT - A No. 1743 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1743 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1743 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1743 of 2026 Keshav Verma .....Petitioner(s) Versus The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate, Vinod Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Arya Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, submits that he is well equipped with the instructions and the instructions are self-sufficient for disposal of the writ petition and he does not propose to file any further affidavit and the petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record, thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed on the post of Sub- Inspector on 01.11.2009 and thereafter he was promoted as Inspector in October, 2020. It is also the case of the petitioner that he was placed under suspension on 11.04.2022 on the allegation that a Criminal Case No. 232 of 2021, under Sections 366, 504,

WRIT - A No. 1743 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam