Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-05

WRIT - A No. 15834 of 2004 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 15834 of 2004 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 15834 of 2004 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15834 of 2004 (Leading) Smt. Madhu .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Sharma, S.P. Singh, Sharad Sinha, Vinod Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. :with: WRIT - A No. - 20 of 2026 (Connected) Smt. Madhu .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Mahesh Sharma, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Sri S.K. Pal, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavit and the writ petitions be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. 3. With the consent of the parties, the writ petitions are being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the writ petitioner is that she happens to be the widow of one Vijay Pratap Singh, who was employed as Waterman on Class IV daily wage post on 01.01.1979. Thereafter on account of promotion of one Sri Deena Nath Chaturvedi a

WRIT - A No. 15834 of 2004 at Allahabad · Niyam