Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-02

WRIT - A No. 1294 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1294 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1294 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1294 of 2026 Chandrabhan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Mohan Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Mohan Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. Instructions have been supplied by Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel, submits that he is well equipped with the instructions and the instructions are self-sufficient for disposal of the writ petition and he does not propose to file any further affidavit and the petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record, thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed on the post of Work Agent (a Class-III post) on 01.07.1984 and he superannuated on 31.07.2009. According to the writ petitioner, since the Work Agents in the Public Works Department of the State of U.P. were performing similar nature of work and shouldering responsibiliti

WRIT - A No. 1294 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam