WRIT - A No. 1188 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1188 of 2026 Pushpendra Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Sunder Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shyam Sunder, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Sigh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel has made a statement at bar that he is possessed with the instructions and he is in a position to argue the matter and he does not propose to file any affidavit, the writ petition be decided on the basis of the documents available on record. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that while the writ petitioner was posted as Peon, he has been placed under suspension on 29.11.2025. 4. Questioning the suspension, the present writ petition has been preferred. 5. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has sought to argue that the impugned suspension order cannot be sustained particularly when there is no recital in the suspension order about pendency or co