Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-19

WELLO RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED vs SANT PARMANAND BLIND RELIEF MISSION

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-74/2026 2026:DHC:1473
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
WELLO RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
SANT PARMANAND BLIND RELIEF MISSION
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 19.02.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 74/2026 & I.A. 4704/2026 (Seeking permission to file lengthy synopsis and list of dates) WELLO RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harshil Wason, Mr. Shivansh Sinha, Advocates and Mr. Roshan Santhalia-AOR. versus SANT PARMANAND BLIND RELIEF MISSION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Madhup Singhal and Mr. Tanmay Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- “a. Allow the present Petition; and b. Issue an ad-interim injunction preventing the Respondent from issuing any termination notice qua the lease deed during the pendency of this Petition (to be brought through a separate stay application) 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the parties, on instructions, submit that they are ad idem that the matter may be referred to arbitration, instead of adjudicating the present Petiti

WELLO RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED vs SANT PARMANAND BLIND RELIEF MISSION · Niyam