Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-23

VIKAS NAGAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-16539/2025 2026:DHC:1794
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS NAGAR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 16539/2025 Date of Decision: 23.02.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: VIKAS NAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, Ms. Supriya Juneja and Mr. Dhananjay Gautam, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) The present proceedings emanate from the directions issued by this Court, pursuant to which the respondent has passed a reasoned and speaking order dated 20.06.2025. 2. The controversy in the present case relates to the entitlement and extent of benefits admissible to a Card holder under the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS). 3. Respondent No. 2, Mr. Shyam Singh Khinchee, is a retired officer of the Government of India. His daughter was married to the petitioner. At the 2. It is placed on record that the daughter of Respondent No. 2, who was the wife of the petitioner, has since passed away. The petitioner, however, seeks action against respondent no.2 who is the father of the petitioner’s late wife for induction of her daughter in the list of beneficiaries under the CGHS. T

VIKAS NAGAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR · Niyam