Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-03

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 vs SPERRY PLAST LTD.

Citation / case number
ITA-90/2026 2026:DHC:895-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1
Respondent
SPERRY PLAST LTD.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 3rd February, 2026. ITA 90/2026 & CM APPL. 7272/2026 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC. versus SPERRY PLAST LTD. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT DINESH MEHTA, J. (Oral) 1. The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as „Act of 1961‟) impugns the order dated 04.06.2025 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’ New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as „the Tribunal‟), whereby the appeal filed by the respondent-assessee was allowed. 2. While allowing the appeal, the Tribunal recorded the following findings:- “9. During the Remand Proceedings, the A.O. made independent enquiries from the above two parties by issuing notice to them. The notice issued by the A.O. has been duly served and both the parties have replied. In so far as Bhargabi Vinimav Pvt. Ltd., the reason assigned for the addition is that the reserve and surplus of the loan creditor was low and the 10. It is relevant to mention that the Assesse