SUNMEET SINGH vs DIVYANK BOSE & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 19.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 27.02.2026 Judgment uploaded on: 27.02.2026 + RFA(COMM) 109/2026, CM APPL. 11739/2026 and CM APPL. 11740/2026 SUNMEET SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Patiyal, Advocate. versus DIVYANK BOSE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Varun singh, Mr. Yatharth Kumar and Mr. Arun Sidhant, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Through the present Appeal, the Appellant (arrayed as Defendant No.4 in the civil suit), assails the correctness of the judgment and decree dated 11.12.2025 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Judgment/IJ] passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as LDJ]. By way of the impugned judgment and decree, the civil suit filed by Respondent No.1 (arrayed as Plaintiff in the civil suit) seeking possession by way of ejectment, recovery of arrears of rent and damages for wrongful use and occupation in respect of the built- up basement floor, without terrace roof rights of property bearing no. Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:27.02.2026 RFA(COMM) 109/2026 Page 1 of 11 10:57:47 13/31, situated at WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit property’], came to be decreed in his favour. 2. For the sake of clarity, consistency and ease of reference, the parties in the present appeal shall be referred to in accordance with their respective status before the LDJ. FACTUAL MATRIX: 3. In order to comprehend the issue falling for consideration of this Court, relevant facts are required to be noticed. 4. The Plaintiff is the lawful owner of the suit property, having purchased the s