SUNIL vs STATE

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 04.11.2025 Pronounced on : 02.02.2026 Uploaded on : 02.02.2026 + CRL.A. 1048/2017 SUNIL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with SI Sanjay Meena. Ms. Sanya Kumar, Advocate for Victim. Mr. Himanshu Anand Gupta, Mr. Shekhar Anand Gupta, Ms. Mansi Yadav, Ms. Shivani, and Ms. Navneet Kaur, Advocates for DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT 1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the judgment of conviction dated 12.07.2017 and the order on sentence dated 05.08.2017 passed by the learned ASJ-SFTC (South East), Saket Courts, Delhi in proceedings arising out of FIR No. 370/2010 registered under Sections 366/376/323 IPC at P.S. Okhla Industrial Area. Vide the impugned order on sentence, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 4 years along with payment of fine of Rs.15,000/- Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PREM CRL.A. 1048/2017 Page 1 of 15 MOHAN CHOUDHARY Signing Date:02.02.2026 22:56:12 , in default whereof he would undergo SI for a period of 6 months, for the offence punishable under Section 366 IPC; RI for a period of 7 years along with payment of fine of Rs.20,000, in default whereof he would undergo SI for 6 months, for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC; and SI for a period of 3 months along with payment of fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default whereof he would undergo SI for 1 month, for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently and the benefit under Section 428 Cr.P.C. was granted to the appellant. Out of the fine realized in view of the above sentence, an amount of Rs.30,000/- was directed to