Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-17

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 395 of 2006 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 395 of 2006 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 395 of 2006 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 395 of 2006 Consolidation Commssioner Inre W.P.No.3387 S/S 1990 .....Appellant(s) Versus Vijay Shanker Pandey .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : C.S.C Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.R.Khan Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Learned State Counsel for State appellant is present. 2. This special appeal was filed way back on 29.06.2006 challenging the judgment and order dated 06.05.2005 passed in writ petition no. 3387 (S/S) 1990. No stay order was granted in this case. We are now in the year 2026. Though the contention of the appellant's counsel is that respondent had worked only for 664 days at the time of passing of the said order, nevertheless, considering the time lapse of about 20 years since passing of the impugned judgment and there being no stay in the matter, this is hardly a matter where this Court should proceed to interfere with the impugned judgment in an intra court appeal at this stage. 3. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) February 17, 2026 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicatu

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 395 of 2006 at Lucknow · Niyam