Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-09

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 99 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 99 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 99 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 99 of 2026 State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of State Tax Lko. And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) Versus Arun Shanker Rai .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : Tushar Mittal, Shhreiya Agarawal Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. (C.M. Application No.1 of 2026) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Heard. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the delay condonation application. 4. Even otherwise, we have gone through the affidavit in support of the application seeking condonation of delay. Cause shown is sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. (Order on memo of the appeal) 5. Heard learned counsel for the State and Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Tushar Mittal & Ms.Shreiya Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent. 6. The appellants have already preferred an application seeking vacation of the interim order which is impugned herein. Even otherwise, it is an interim order

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 99 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam