Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-02-20

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 658 of 2024 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 658 of 2024 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 658 of 2024 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 658 of 2024 State of U.P. through Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Ayush Anubhag -I Lko. and another .....Appellant(s) Versus Dr. Om Prakash Pandey .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : V.P. Nag (A.C.S.C.) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinod Kumar Shukla Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view of the fact that the issue as raised in the present appeal stands settled by way of an order passed in Misc. Application Diary No. 2400 of 2024 in Civil Appeal No. 3933 of 2023: Union of India and another Vs. M. Siddaraj, wherein the directions given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in identical nature matters have been clarified/modified and, therefore, the appeal may be decided in terms of the said order. 2. In view of the fact that in the case of M. Siddaraj (supra), the direction pertained to the grant of benefit w.e.f. 01.05.2023 and in the present case, the learned Single Judge has directed grant of benefit w.e.f. 01.07.2023, the appeal, apparently has no substance, the same is therefore, dismissed. (J

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 658 of 2024 at Lucknow · Niyam