Delhi High Court · 2026-02-16
SMT.ROOPWATI vs SH. GAJRAJ @ GAJJI AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- CM(M)-283/2026 2026:DHC:1322
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SMT.ROOPWATI
- Respondent
- SH. GAJRAJ @ GAJJI AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16th February, 2026 CM(M) 283/2026 SMT.ROOPWATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh and Mr. Shrikant Shukla, Advocates. versus SH. GAJRAJ @ GAJJI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kabir Kr. Hazarika, Mr. Surender Kumar, Mr. Abhay Singh, Mr. Anshul B. and Mr. Mayank, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 7787/2026 & CM APPL. 7788/2026 (for exemptions) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 283/2026 & CM APPL. 7789/2026 3. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 08th December, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ no. 478/2022, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff has been closed. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondents appears on advance notice and 5. Heard. Record Perused. 6. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner was unable to lead her evidence because of her age and medical condition. It is further argued that