Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-02-09

SHREEKRISHNA CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Citation / case number
WP/918/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
SHREEKRISHNA CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

WP-918-2024-F1.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.918 OF 2024 Shreekrishna Chaitanya Enterprises, A partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Having it’s Office at Radhakunj Bungalow, Maryland Complex, Opposite Corporation Bank, I. C. Colony, Borivali (West), Mumbai : 400 103, Through one of it’s Partners : Mr.Radhakrishna Sabaji Desai. ...Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Housing Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032. 2. The Inspector General of Registration and Controller of Stamps, Ground Floor, New Administrative Building, Opposite : Vidhanbhavan (Council Hall), Pune : 411001. ...Respondents ***** Ms.Hima Khumar i/b. Mr.Makarand Raut, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.Himanshu Takke, AGP, for the Respondents-State. ***** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 9th FEBRUARY 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : S.M.MODAK, J.) 1. Heard learned Advocate Shri.Raut for the petitioner and learned +0530 AGP for the respondents-State. Satish Sangar 1/10 WP-918-2024-F1.doc 2. The issue involved in this petition is about entitlement of the petitioner to claim

SHREEKRISHNA CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR · Niyam