Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-02-11

SANJAY GUPTA AND VINAY GUPTA vs VINEET JAIN, PROPRIETOR OF VIJAYPAL VINEET KUMAR AND CO

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-44/2026 2026:DHC:1248-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJAY GUPTA AND VINAY GUPTA
Respondent
VINEET JAIN, PROPRIETOR OF VIJAYPAL VINEET KUMAR AND CO
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (COMM) 44/2026, CM APPL. 9539/2026, CM APPL. 9540/2026, CM APPL. 9541/2026, CM APPL. 9542/2026 & CM APPL. 9543/2026 SANJAY GUPTA AND VINAY GUPTA .... Appellants Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogia, Adv. with Mr. S.K. Bansal. Adv. versus VINEET JAIN, PROPRIETOR OF VIJAYPAL VINEET KUMAR AND CO .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 11.02.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This appeal assails order dated 16 January 2026 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Courts-06)1, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS (Comm) 48/20262, issued summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19083 filed by the appellant, returnable on 27 February 2026, i.e. 16 days from now. The appellant (the plaintiff in the suit) is aggrieved by the rejection, by the learned Commercial Court, of the 1 “learned Commercial Court” hereinafter 2 “the suit” hereinafter 3 “CPC” hereinafter 2. In these circumstances, we suggested, to Mr. Gogia who appears on behalf of the appellant that it would be more expedient if we were to direct the