SANGEETA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1036/2025 SANGEETA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra Kanth, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Krishan, PS Palam Village Mr. Yogesh Sharma and Ms. Pratima Ravi, Advocates with complainant CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 282/2024 of PS Palam Village for offence under Section 420/468/471/448/ 380/454/457/34 IPC. 2. This anticipatory bail application got listed before the predecessor bench for the first time on 12.03.2025. Thereafter, the application remained pending before different benches and has been assigned to this bench as a part of 179 old pending bail applications. Today being the first date before me, I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP BAIL APPLN. 1036/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 Digitally Signed 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.02.24 18:12:50 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:24.02.2026 18:20:48 assisted by IO/SI Krishan. I have also heard learned counsel for complainant de facto. 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is that in connivance with her husband, she forged the title documents of the property owned by the complainant de facto. The subject property was originally owned by one Mahavir Singh, who sold the same to Rameshwari.