SANDHYA vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 571/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4319/2026 SANDHYA .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given). versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The applicant/accused seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 344/2025 of Police Station Rajouri Garden for the offence under Section 318(4)/336(3)/ 340(2)/338/61(2)/3(5) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, the interim bail sought by the accused/applicant is on the ground of illness of her two year old child. The only allegation against the accused/applicant in the FIR is: “we suspect the wife Mrs. Sandhya and father of Mr. Varun Arora, Mr.Krishan Gopal Arora who are conspirators in this fraud.” 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant has taken me through record especially the alleged illness of the two year old daughter of the accused/applicant. BAIL APPLN. 571/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH Signature Not Verified COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.02.09 17:56:29 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:09.02.2026 17:57:41 4. Learned prosecutor opposes the interim bail on the ground that according to the report filed before the learned Court of Sessions, there are other relatives also of the accused/applicant, who can take care of the child. 5. In my considered view, especially keeping in mind the limited allegation against the acc