ROHIT vs STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.02.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 866/2026, CRL.M.A. 6642/2026, 6643/2026 & 6644/2026 ROHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhakar Tiwari, Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Ajay Kumar Srivastav, Advocates. versus STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Narender. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 357/2024 of PS Chitranjan Park for offence under Section 309(6)/310(2)/311/317 (3)/61(2)/3(5) of BNS and Section 25/27 of Arms Act. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Narender Singh. BAIL APPLN. 866/2026 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6f b4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80c bd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.02.27 17:02:43 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:27.02.2026 17:15:20 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks parity with the bail granted to the co-accused persons by this court by way of orders annexed as Annexure P-7, P-8 and P-10. 4. Learned APP opposes the bail application, presenting submissions on the instructions of the IO, which submissions are contrary to or not raised in the case of bail applications of the remaining accused persons. 5. Broadly speaking, according to the prosecution case, the accused/applicant and his co-accused persons forcibly entered house of the complainant de facto and committed robbery. The total number of