RHINO FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED vs GOLDEN BAG TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 250/2024, I.A. 30865/2024 (Stay) & I.A. 30868/2024 (Delay of 26 days in Re-filing the petition) RHINO FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit K. Pateria, Advocate. versus GOLDEN BAG TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta, Ms. Pragya Narayan and Ms. Nabam Yama, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], read with Section 10(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the impugned Arbitral Award dated 07.10.2023. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent raises a preliminary objection on the ground of limitation, submitting that the present petition is barred by delay. He submits that 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent further submits that a copy of the arbitral award was also dispatched by speed post to the address of the Petitioner company, as reflected in the arbitral record, namely, H-55, Sector-63, Noida, Uttar Pradesh- 201301, and that the