REEMA ARORA vs STATE AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 15th December, 2025 Pronounced on: 20th February, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 831/2021 SMT. REEMA ARORA W/o Sh. Vijay Arora, R/o Flat No.23, Pocket-9, Sector-25, Rohini, Delhi. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav and Mr. Prashant Advocates. versus 1. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2. SH. UTTAM CHAND MEENA S/o Gyani Ram Meena, R/o 17-D.D.A. MIG Flats, Vikas Niketan, North Extension, Near Agrasen Dharamshala, Pitampura, New Delhi. 3. SH. MAHINDER SINGH (POLICE OFFICIAL) Post in Delhi Police Mob. 9812014380 .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib, Haider, APP for State with SI Satish Kumar and SI Lal Chand, PS: S.B. Dairy. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CRL.M.C. 831/2021 Page 1 of 7 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:20.02.2026 16:59:29 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Reema Arora, to challenge the Order dated 07.12.2019 vide which learned ASJ has upheld the Order of learned MM dated 22.01.2019, dismissing the Complaint of the Petitioner under Section 200 Cr.P.C. 2. The brief facts of the case are that Petitioner / Complainant, Reema Arora filed Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the Respondents for offences under Sections 307/511/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’). 3. The Petitioner submitted that she has been residing at the given address in Sector 25, Rohini with her family members. On 09.09.2009, a PCR Van came to her house and asked her to accompany them to Police Station. She along with her son, went to the Police Station, where Respondent / Uttam Chand Meena and his wife, Gargi Meena were