RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH vs MANJEET SOLANKI

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27th February, 2026 + CM(M) 1138/2025 & CM APPL. 68427/2025 RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelampreet, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore and Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advocates along with Petitioner in person. versus MANJEET SOLANKI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with Respondent in person. Mr. Sharique Hussain and Ms. Kirti Garg, Advocate for R-BSES (Through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 26thApril, 2025, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 1843/2024, whereby the application of the petitioner/ plaintiff for restoration of the electricity has been dismissed. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is facing severe hardship on account of disconnection of electricity at the said Signature Not Verified Signed By:MANISHA CM(M) 1138/2025 Page 1 of 3 RAJPUT Signing Date:28.02.2026 12:11:38 premises, which has remained disconnected since 17th September, 2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner is running a coaching centre in the said premises and, due to the disconnection of electricity, he is unable to carry on his classes, thereby adversely affecting his livelihood. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has not executed any Rent Agreement with the respondent, thereby resulting in difficulties faced by the respondent in completing the