RAJENDER YADAV vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 02.02.2026 CRL.M.C. 845/2026, CRL.M.A. 3346/2026 & 3347/2026 RAJENDER YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Alok, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Rahul, PS Malviya Nagar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 13.10.2025 of the Court of Sessions whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the petition is completely frivolous. 3. At the very outset, the legal position was pointed out to counsel for petitioner as follows. The provision under Section 438(3) BNSS (Section 397(3) CrPC) prohibits second revision petition. What is explicitly prohibited by law cannot be allowed a backdoor entry unless the petitioner is able to establish a case of gross injustice. It is on this aspect that learned counsel for petitioner was called upon to address the gross injustice, if any, CRL.M.C. 845/2026 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6f b4835